The American Omnivore’s Dilemma
The dilemma on evaluating safety in consumption of organic foods is aimed to be resolved and explained in the light of taking various perspectives most crucial to its understanding.
Clearly expounded on Pollan’s book by providing the gist, to wit: “Pollan explains in satisfying detail how American food production, once sun-based, became fossil-fuel based: Instead of using the sun to grow grass to feed cows, we now use fossil fuels to process corn into feed for pigs and cows—and to process corn into feed for humans” (Cowen, 2006, par. 2). The author likewise indicated both strengths and weaknesses of Pollan’s book, particularly in its shortsightedness in encompassing macroeconomic perspectives in his recommendations.
The discourse provided a concisely written objective and critical analysis of Pollan’s book by looking at the issues from an economist’s perspective. The points of contentions were valid and credible given the educational background and expertise of the author. The contents should therefore be included in the current research to provide a more objective view and structure of writing on the Omnivore’s Dilemma.
Provided a critical review on Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals through an objective assessment of the author’s style of writing, including competencies on the subject. Kamp’s contention is that the strength of Pollan’s book lies in the supermeticulous style of reporting. where being too nice was perceived to be its debility.
The article provided a concise review of what readers can expect from Pollan’s book through the eyes of a qualified journalist where information was delivered in a critical and rhetorical structure that appealed to the readers’ intellectual and emotional perceptions. There are relevant contentions on the book’s contents, particularly on the